Claire (claire_chan) wrote in latin,

  • Mood:
  • Music:

My Invective Against Similarity in Translation

Quoth me from the LatinStudy Email Group:
I dislike sticking close to "answer keys" - I don't like the feeling I'm being brainwashed into acting like a zombie identical to everyone else, unless there is a very clearly delineated reason why one must use x.

Take into consideration the subjunctive mood - were, would, etc - there is generally a specific reason why I would be using "would" to express myself; e.g. in the sentence ""There is ... a ... reason why I would be using "would"..."" - see, I am not REALLY using "would" right now, except I am here.
Recursive reasoning often works - similar to why one writes a line on top of an infinite repetition of numbers or shows a number of repetitions and writes at the end an ellipsis to indicate it never ends.
1 divided by 3 is .33333...

Latin certainly helps inform my vocabulary choices, as does Russian, Chinese, German, Greek, and the other miscellaneous languages I have studied in the past decade.
Latin helps me communicate the most, as it should help us all! Latin was my first/best "foreign" language. (Most likely Spanish was historically my first, but I don't use it at all.)

Why don't we all have more unique answers? I think that synonyms are also acceptable, depending on the situation...

Translation is an art form. How may we best express a thought?
That reason is why the collators make these collations - showing the entire group how certain individuals translate each respective example.
Tags: grammar, indirect statement, latin prose composition
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.